This digital edition of The box of whistles — Edition Insights is described by source-level measurements including 24,247 words, 1 hr 46 min estimated reading time, and 22 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Organ (Musical instrument) -- Construction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 119 minutes
Music History
27,248 recorded words. 13 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #37786About 84 minutes
Music History
19,091 recorded words. 22 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #16488About 146 minutes
Music History
33,437 recorded words. 40 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #73668Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 90 public books, 90 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergJohn Norbury opens his 1877 survey with a disarmingly modest disclaimer: he does not aim to teach the player, the maker, or the architect. Instead, he offers The Box of Whistles as an incitement to future improvement. The book's title itself—a colloquial term for an organ—signals a blend of technical curiosity and wry observation. Norbury's method is that of a traveling connoisseur: he records dates of visits, notes case styles, pipe counts, and decorative features, and does not hesitate to judge an instrument's quality. His descriptions range from the grand (St. Paul's, with a case by Grinling Gibbons) to the modest (a Picardy village church with a 'good-looking organ'). The result is a document that captures both the variety and the idiosyncrasies of nineteenth-century organ building.
Norbury's notes are anchored by specific dates—1866, 1868, 1869, 1875—and by precise observations of case structure. At Troyes Cathedral, he describes a five-tower case with a central tower containing the five largest pipes, surmounted by King David with his harp. He notes the angels holding festoons of flowers, the giants supporting the end towers, and a sitting angel playing a violin. The Choir Organ has three towers, the smallest carrying a shield. Such detail is typical: Norbury records the number of pipes per tower, the presence of carved panels, and the use of materials like oak, gilding, or natural wood. He also notes when pipes are left 'their natural colour,' a default for foreign organs unless stated otherwise.
Norbury does not merely describe; he evaluates. At St. Lo, he finds the organ 'noisy and bad.' At Strasburg Cathedral, Silberman's instrument is 'sweet, but a little muffled.' He notes that a lady had presided at the Strasburg organ for some years, and that it received damage during the siege. At St. Lawrence, Jewry, he praises one of Harris's organs as 'of nearly perfect design.' These judgments are terse but revealing: Norbury values clarity, balance, and appropriate power. He also comments on practical matters, such as the proposal at Troyes to remove a stone vault and replace it with iron girders to better reveal a rose window. His eye is as much on the building as on the instrument.
Norbury's classification of organ cases into four classes, with subdivisions, suggests a systematic approach. He discusses style—Gothic, Renaissance, modern Gothic—and argues that a case need not correspond with the architecture of the building. He notes that tin pipes are seldom used, and that English cases over the last hundred years have varied widely. He describes the arrangement of towers, the use of 'ponts' (bridges), and the role of carving between pipes. The Choir Organ, he observes, can serve as a screen to the player. His illustrations, though not reproduced in the excerpts, are clearly integral: the frontispiece shows St. Paul's, and larger images are available by clicking. Norbury's work is as much a visual record as a textual one.
Readers should approach The Box of Whistles as a period document, not a comprehensive history. Norbury's judgments are personal and his coverage uneven—he saw what he could, when he could. The value lies in the specificity: the dates, the pipe counts, the descriptions of carving and gilding. For those interested in organ architecture, this is a primary source of observations made on the ground in the 1860s and 1870s. The illustrations, though not fully represented here, are essential to the work's purpose.
Flipping through Norbury's organ cases, I often pause on his quiet joy in how a wooden shell shapes the breath within. That fondness for hidden structure echoes, strangely, in the pages of Musical Studies — Text and Context, where the same patient curiosity lingers. Both feel less like lectures and more like a friend pointing softly at something lovely.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.
